Dan NjegomirDan NjegomirJune 26, 20176min517

In ordinary times, if there were an ordinary Republican in the Oval Office, there’d be no need to comment on Colorado Republican U.S. Sen. Cory Gardner’s stand on foreign trade. The two likely would be on the same page, supporting a more or less free exchange of goods and services between the U.S. and the world. Business as usual for the party of business.

But the Republican now in the White House is of a different stripe on trade as on some other key issues. At least, if you go by his policy pronouncements thus far. Which explains a joint press statement today by Gardner and Colorado’s Democratic senior U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet calling on the administration to narrow its “investigation” launched in April into “Aluminum Imports and Threats to National Security.”

It’s an obscure policy initiative by the White House, far off the Colorado public’s radar — essentially, a first step toward trade sanctions against aluminum imports — and Gardner and Bennet make a case in their press release that what we don’t know could hurt us:

In April, the President directed the Secretary of Commerce in consultation with the Secretary of Defense to investigate whether foreign imports of aluminum are endangering our national security. Colorado is a major beer-producing state and the results of this investigation could have an enormous impact on Colorado’s beer industry.

And by “enormous impact,” they mean raise the cost of doing business. So the two senators and six others (including another Democrat) signed a letter asking the administration to exempt from its investigation the kinds of sheet aluminum used to make food and beverage containers, among other products. The letter reads in part:

We are concerned, however, that the scope of this investigation could include aluminum that has no national security application …

… Import restrictions or tariffs on these products could increase consumer prices, add hundreds of millions in costs for companies in the beverage industry, and potentially affect American manufacturing jobs in industries that rely on these products.

Moreover, the letter states, there simply isn’t enough U.S.-produced aluminum to satisfy demand by U.S. industries — including Colorado beer — that need it.

You may be wondering how importing aluminum could imperil national security. Ask most economists, and they’ll say it can’t. But there is an opposing, pro-“fair” trade school of thought — embraced by some economists but probably more politicians — that holds that cheap imports put vital U.S. industries at risk. As the administration explains it in the above-linked, April 27 memorandum ordering the investigation by the Commerce Department:

… The artificially low prices caused by excess capacity and unfairly traded imports suppress profits in the American aluminum industry, which discourages long-term investment in the industry and hinders efforts by American aluminum producers to research and develop new and better grades of aluminum. …

Presumably, that would undermine the U.S. aluminum industry’s preparedness for some crisis. A war, perhaps.

Wouldn’t the U.S. still be able to get aluminum from abroad? Maybe not, the fair traders say; overseas aluminum sources might dry up if those foreign sources are hostile.

OK, but Gardner and Bennet tell us, “Primary aluminum that is made into rolled can sheet is largely sourced from Canada” — a nation with which the U.S. is unlikely to go to war. Especially not with a charmer like Justin Trudeau at the helm.

The fair traders would say you can’t be too cautious; critics would say the fair traders are connecting too many dots — and that “national security” is really just a lofty label for job protection. What’s wrong with that? Nothing, say the critics, so long as you don’t mind protecting a relative handful of jobs at the expense of millions of U.S. consumers.

Enough with the economics lesson; let’s get back to politics: The takeaway here is that Cory Gardner again finds himself at odds with his own party’s president on trade — and it’s the president, not Gardner, who is outside his party’s mainstream on the issue.

Last month, Gardner voted against confirming Trump’s pick for U.S. trade representative, Robert Lighthizer, who is a longtime critic of free trade. Gardner at the time contended Lighthizer’s policies, “could hurt Colorado’s farmers and ranchers.”

Gardner of course takes care not to turn any of it into a thumb in the president’s eye; he keeps it all very cordial. It’s not a hill to die on, not when there’s so much else at stake.



Morgan SmithMorgan SmithJune 19, 20177min417

Now that the Trump administration has initiated the process of renegotiating the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), let’s hope that this process is marked by thoughtfulness and not rhetoric like the president’s earlier comments that NAFTA was “the worst trade deal in history.” Despite the anti-trade rhetoric, NAFTA has been ...

Dan NjegomirDan NjegomirMay 11, 20174min1088

When the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate voted overwhelmingly today to approve President Trump’s nominee to be the next U.S. trade representative — with majorities of both parties, for a change, backing the president’s pick — Colorado Republican U.S. Sen. Cory Gardner wasn’t among them.

Gardner was one of only three Republicans to vote no. His reason for stiff-arming his own party’s president? The nomination, he says, is bad for Colorado agriculture.

The Senate voted 82-14 to confirm Robert Lighthizer — a trade lawyer, Washington veteran, onetime member of the Reagan administration and vocal critic of free trade — to the post that is instrumental in mapping out U.S. trade policy. The lopsided support for Lighthizer in the Senate — despite bitter Democratic opposition to the president who nominated him — is said to reflect Lighthizer’s crossover appeal. Though he is a conservative Republican, his support for protectionist policies has endeared him to populist, liberal Democrats in the labor movement and elsewhere who long have denounced free trade as a job killer that only serves fat-cat shareholders in multinational corporations.

Gardner couldn’t disagree more, and he issued this statement:

“I could not support Robert Lighthizer’s nomination to become the United States Trade Representative because I’m afraid his policies could hurt Colorado’s farmers and ranchers. In light of the current agricultural crisis facing much of rural America, if we are not open to new trade opportunities, farmers and ranchers in Colorado and across the country will continue to struggle to make ends meet. We have to allow our agricultural products to flow to markets around the world and negotiate fair deals that will boost agriculture exports. Although I did not support Lighthizer’s nomination today, I am committed to working with him to advance the interests of Colorado’s agriculture community.”

Gardner was born and raised in the northeastern Colorado farm town of Yuma, and before his election to the U.S. Senate, he represented Colorado’s heavily agricultural 4th Congressional District in the U.S. House.

He joined Republican U.S. Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Ben Sasse of Nebraska along with 11 Democrats in opposing LIghthizer’s nomination.

However Gardner’s vote affects his standing with the Trump team — he no doubt got a wink from the Senate GOP leadership considering the confirmation was a shoo-in — his stance arguably squares with the sensibilities of heavily Republican Colorado farmers and ranchers ever on the hunt for new markets.

Like Mark Hillman, the Republican former Colorado Senate majority and minority leader — and wheat farmer — from Burlington. Reached for comment, Hillman saw eye-to-eye with Gardner:

“As someone who grew up in a farming community, Senator Gardner well understands that limiting potential buyers for grain and livestock would be devastating to Colorado farmers and ranchers, who are already struggling to make ends meet with depressed prices,” Hillman told us.

We thought we’d also check with the Colorado Farm Bureau for its take on the development. We’ll let you know when we hear back; we’ll guess the farm bureau, too, likes to see wide-open markets for Colorado’s wide-ranging agricultural products.


Peter MarcusPeter MarcusFebruary 3, 20173min291
Poor Gov. John Hickenlooper left for Cuba on Thursday for a weekend business trip in which he will “lay the groundwork for cultural and economic exchange” given the potential for new opportunities. “Taking a weekend out of town was not my idea, was not where I wanted to go,” the governor said informally at a […]

This content is only available to subscribers.

Login or Subscribe


Clifford D. MayClifford D. MayNovember 24, 20168min485

First and foremost: Nothing is more pivotal to democratic governance then holding free and fair elections that lead to a peaceful transference of power. Over the past week, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama all demonstrated that they get that. This is an achievement that should not be taken for granted — an achievement that remains out of reach in too many of the world’s nations. Sadly, thousands of Americans are too ignorant to comprehend that. They have been not just protesting — that’s fine, that’s their right — but attacking Trump supporters, burning American flags and vandalizing property. Not without justification do Trump voters see this as confirmation that they made the right choice. The majority of those voters live in “flyover country,” the vast American heartland between the Acela Corridor and the Left Coast. Most pollsters and journalists, ostensible pulse-takers of the nation, had not a clue as to what they were thinking.


Ernest LuningErnest LuningJanuary 26, 201610min474
Republican Bruce Baker, a member of the Westminster City Council, is challenging five-term U.S. Rep. Ed Perlmutter, a Golden Democrat, on a platform of ending immigration into the United States and slapping a punitive tariff on all imports into the country. “We need to end immigration — all immigration, not just illegal immigration,” Baker told […]

This content is only available to subscribers.

Login or Subscribe