Adam McCoyAdam McCoyMarch 19, 20183min682

It’s been about a month since Denver police offered to take bump stocks off any owner’s hands as the city’s ban on the device officially became active.

Yet, no such device has been surrendered, Denverite reports.

In late January, Denver became among the first cities in the country to institute a ban on bump stocks — the device reportedly used by the shooter in the Las Vegas massacre to increase his weapons’ rate of fire.

As the ban went into effect, the Denver Police Department said in February to avoid being in violation of the newly-enacted ordinance, any residents with bump stocks can now turn them over to the authorities.

Bump stocks replace an assault rifle’s standard stock and free the weapon to slide back and forth rapidly, channeling the energy from the weapon’s recoil. That allows for more rapid fire, nearly that of a fully automatic weapon. The device is most notable for its use in the Las Vegas massacre — the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history.

The bump stock measure, crafted by candidate for state Senate Alan Kennedy-Shaffer and introduced by Councilman Rafael Espinoza, amended the city’s existing ordinance banning assault weapons to make it illegal to sell, carry, store or otherwise possess a bump stock.

The measure also now makes it unlawful to have a magazine capable of holding more than 15 rounds. The old standard was 21 rounds in Denver; the change will bring the city into compliance with existing state law.

Denver joined Columbia, S.C., believed to be the first city to institute a ban according to NPR, in being the among the first cities to pass legislation related to bump stocks.


Adam McCoyAdam McCoyJanuary 2, 20183min1096

A Denver councilman has proposed a ban on bump stocks — the device used by the Las Vegas shooter in October to increase his weapons’ rate of fire.

The legislation proposed by Denver Councilman Rafael Espinoza would amend the city’s existing ordinance banning assault weapons to make it illegal to sell, carry, store or otherwise possess a bump stock. The bill will go before Denver’s Safety, Housing, Education and Homelessness Committee on Wednesday. If approved, it will move on to the full City Council.

Bump stocks replace an assault rifle’s standard stock and frees the weapon to slide back and forth rapidly, channeling the energy from the weapon’s recoil. That allows for more rapid fire, nearly that of a fully automatic weapon.

The device came under the critical eye of congressional lawmakers after its use in the Las Vegas massacre — the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history — though the push to ban the device has slowed as of late.

The legislation notes the use of bump stocks during the Las Vegas mass shooting and how “the city could be susceptible to the dangers of bump stock firing mechanisms.”

In an interview with the Denver Post, Espinoza said: “I’m under no illusion that if somebody is hell-bent on committing a heinous crime, they could both have larger magazines and modify their weapon. But that said, the only people in the city and county of Denver that should have that kind of firepower are law enforcement and trained officials.”

Per the bill, Espinoza defines a bump stock as “any device for a pistol, rifle, or shotgun that increases the rate of fire achievable with such weapon by using energy from the recoil of the weapon to generate a reciprocating action that facilitates repeated activation of the trigger.”

The penalty for violating the measure could carry up to 180 days in jail and $999 in fines.


Adam McCoyAdam McCoyAugust 24, 20175min676

Tell me if you’ve heard this one before. Denver is thriving and growing and being redeveloped at a rapid clip — to the dismay of some residents grappling to preserve the vanishing character and charm of their neighborhood.

Take the case of a rezoning proposal before the Denver City Council on Monday. Property owner Urban Land Acquisitions LLC requested a 0.24-acre lot at 1208 N. Quitman St. be rezoned to allow for a five-story development with a mix of residential and non-residential (like retail) on the ground floor. The zoning would also allow for an all commericial-use development, though square footage would be limited to 10,000 square feet. There isn’t yet a development plan for the site.

But the possibility of a five-story building in the West Colfax neighborhood filled with single-family homes and three-story, multi-unit buildings didn’t sit well with some residents. About half a dozen neighbors voiced their concern about the zoning proposal during a public hearing Monday night. And, the city received 27 letters in opposition and 26 in support, including the Sloan’s Lake Citizen Group, Senior City Planner Theresa Lucero said.

Bruce O’Donnell, spokesperson for property owner, noted the owner has listened to the neighborhood concerns, mainly focused on the possible height of the building, and has proposed a covenant that would restrict height to four stories and 55 feet on the lot for the next 25 years.

Nonetheless, neighbors advocated for the City Council to recommend the owner amend the rezoning request to allow for three stories, mixed-use on the parcel, to help maintain some of the character of the neighborhood while allowing for redevelopment. (There is a zoning district that would allow for three-story, mixed-use, but it didn’t exist when the owner initially filed the proposal. Council President Albus Brooks was miffed this zoning district wasn’t part of the discussion in light of height concerns before the proposal reached the full council).

But, arguing it is bound to consider a rezoning proposal based on whether it meets defined criteria, the City Council approved the measure 8-3. Brooks and Council members Rafael Espinoza and Kevin Flynn cast the nay votes.

“It’s in compliance with our plans, it’s in compliance with the West Colfax neighborhood plan and it’s not the only development in the neighborhood,” Councilman Paul Lopez, whose district encompasses the neighborhood, said of the rezoning proposal.

Espinoza wasn’t convinced the zoning proposal was in agreement with adopted plans.

“Philosophically, my heart is in this sort of zone district, but I cannot support it because I don’t think it has valid plan support that it needs in order for us to grossly say the criteria has been met” he said.

Acknowledging that Denver is growing, neighbor John Buckner characterized development in his area as both a benefit and a curse. Since moving into the neighborhood in 2013, his block has been inundated with multi-unit developments, leaving unrecognizable the neighborhood he knew when he moved.

The area is rapidly changing, Lucero noted during a presentation. Eight multi-unit developments have gone up in the last three years, and four more are currently under review.

“We are seeing rather rapid redevelopment of the area,” Lucero said.

With the site next to the Perry Street light rail station, high-density development makes sense, Council members said. The city has increasingly encouraged such development by public transit to encourage commuters to use the train instead of drive.

“What good is a light rail station around a bunch of single-family homes?” Lopez said.


Adam McCoyAdam McCoyAugust 13, 20178min641

As the 22-year-old Denver International Airport outgrows its dated design, it must undergo a modernization of sorts, principally to address security vulnerabilities like long lines at security checkpoints.

That’s airport officials’ contention in touting a stout, complex $1.8 billion, 34-year public-private partnership with a consortium of companies led by Spanish transportation infrastructure behemoth Ferrovial.

The Great Hall Project will help one of Colorado’s major transportation hubs adapt to the evolving nature of air travel, airport executives say.

“You do not use terminals today like you did in 1995,” DIA CEO Kim Day said during a Denver committee meeting last month.

It would chiefly address security issues at screening points through $650 million in renovations. The proposed four-year overhaul would move security screening from level 5 to the sixth floor alongside ticketing; resolve the awkward flow of passenger traffic; triple the space for new concessions on level 5; and add new technology improving efficiency at security checkpoints and check-in areas among other additions, airport executives say.

And with DIA passenger traffic swelling to 58.3 million last year and the airport on pace to set a new passenger record by year’s end, the renovations would address perpetual growth at the airport, boosting capacity in the Jeppesen terminal to 80 million passengers per year.

“We are exceeding the design capacity of the terminal and we will not be able to accommodate the growth that our airlines are projecting,” Day said of not moving forward with the renovations.

Much of the Denver City Council appears poised to OK the partnership, and local construction leaders are giddy over the potential for new work in the city, but the 15,000-page pact has drawn the critical eye of airlines, labor unions, community members and City Council members including Deborah Ortega and Rafael Espinoza.

Both have said they’re uneasy about the lose of oversight detailed in the contract regarding concessions, with the consortium taking over management control of new concessions for three decades under the agreement, and wary of what they characterize as inadequate time to weigh the agreement before a vote. Ortega and Espinoza co-authored a letter requesting a vote postponement of 120 days to afford more time to study the pact.

But the clock is ticking on the City Council. Though the city would retain all the design and other work done to this point, it would be on the hook for a $9 million penalty paid to the partners if the agreement isn’t approved by Sept. 1.

Nonetheless, the City Council could vote on the deal as early as Aug. 14.

“If DIA wants my vote (on Aug. 14), I’ll need more time,” Espinoza told Colorado Politics. “DIA likely feels comfortable it has the requisite number of votes. But I’m making it clear. I am not comfortable moving forward. I need more time with the contract.”

The numbers

Under the agreement, DIA will be on the hook for as much as $1.8 billion. DIA CFO Gisela Shanahan said the airport will contribute $480 million toward the renovations via progress payments over the four years of construction, and allocate an additional $120 million in contingency funds.

Over the remaining 30 years of the agreement, DIA could pay up to $1.2 billion in reimbursement payments to the Ferrovial partners for concessions operations and maintenance costs and financing costs.

Meanwhile, the consortium partners — Ferrovial, Saunders Concessions and MJE/Loop Capital — will invest $378 million over the life of the deal through cash, debt and other means. The partners do expect a return on their investment of 10.8 percent.

Ferrovial will design and construct the renovations and assume the risk for any cost overruns or delays on the project. While Ferrovial will operate new concessions, Denver will split revenues taking 80 percent to 20 percent and retain control of concessions on DIA’s three concourses.

Officials say the airport could go it alone in financing the project for a lower price tag, but the partnership shields DIA from some of the risks associated with the project.

‘Paying a premium’

While he acknowledges the built-in protections in the public-private partnership, Espinoza said DIA is paying a premium for those benefits. He’d rather take the work already done, have the airport go it alone and finance the project at a lower cost. Considering the length of the agreement and the Ferrovial consortium taking management control of new concessions, he said it appears the deal is designed to circumvent the Council.

Other City Council members like Christopher Herndon have expressed support for the agreement, but Espinoza said he needs more time to see what other Council members see in the pact.

“This is a lot for me to digest in a very limited amount of time,” he said during a July 26 committee meeting on the project.

Councilwoman Deborah Ortega has also been outspoken on the project arguing she isn’t comfortable with the City Council’s loss of oversight for concession contracts. In a letter advocating for an 120-extension, she said there are unanswered questions.

“Mayor Hancock and DIA should pursue a 120-day extension to provide Council time to fully review a contract it took three years to develop,” Ortega and Espinoza wrote. “It would also provide time for the DIA team to work with our partner airlines that will incur a 28 percent increase in fees to provide concession space in the main hall.”

Local labor union leaders have expressed anxiety over protections for airport workers and airlines like United, Frontier and Southwest say they back renovating the airport, but are concerned about the operational and financial feasibility of the project.

United Airlines President Scott Kirby said level 6 is already crowded and the renovations would leave little room for travelers. And estimates place DIA wait times on an average day at 82 minutes Kirby said.

“That’s the root of our concern,” he said. “If you’re going to do something like that, people won’t come to Denver. We are really concerned that we harm the airport and the local economy by doing this.”

If approved, DIA construction could start next summer in “discrete phases” as to avoid disrupting travel through the Mile High City.


Mike McKibbinMike McKibbinMay 24, 20179min490

After nearly a decade, Denver Regional Transportation District’s University of Denver and Colorado light rail stations need to become more visible gateways to surrounding communities, rather than the "back doors" they now represent to their neighborhoods, according to a study of the two stations and their mobility possibilities. “It is time these stations transition from commuter stations to integrated mobility hubs and active local destinations,” reads an online City and County of Denver study description.


Mike McKibbinMike McKibbinApril 21, 20178min386

A first-time, multi-department planning process in the City and County of Denver — known as Denveright — is working well, members of Denver City Council were recently told. The effort was announced nearly one year ago by Mayor Michael Hancock and is designed to show a vision for Denver over the next two decades. Four coordinated plans will help shape the future of Denver’s land use, mobility and parks and recreational resources.


Mike McKibbinMike McKibbinApril 11, 20179min408

Instead of a sought-after additional five hours of business, Denver's recreational marijuana dispensaries seem likely to be allowed three extra hours, and city coffers could see between $664,000 to $1.3 million in extra revenue if all those dispensaries decided to take advantage of the extra hours that may soon be allowed under a City and County of Denver policy change. But the idea is not unanimously supported on Denver City Council or by the body's constituents. Currently, Denver’s hours of operation for both medical and recreational marijuana dispensaries are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. State regulations allow all marijuana dispensaries to be open from 8 a.m. to midnight, subject to local regulation. Many other Colorado municipalities allow dispensaries to stay open until either 10 p.m. or midnight, including Aurora, Boulder, Commerce City, Edgewater and Glendale.


Mike McKibbinMike McKibbinMarch 29, 20177min351

A five-party funding arrangement is to be considered by Denver City Council that would eventually allow some 2,800 new homes to be built on the former Stapleton International Airport property, which was decommissioned in the mid-1990s. The Stapleton “Five Parties” (City and County of Denver, Denver Urban Renewal Authority, Denver Public Schools, Forest City and Park Creek Metropolitan District) have agreed on an arrangement to fund and build an additional school, fire station and other infrastructure at Stapleton.