A group of nationally prominent conservative organizers on Wednesday called on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and other Republican Senate leaders to resign, charging they've failed to pass any substantive legislation even as the GOP controls every branch of government.
Congressional candidate Darryl Glenn likes to tell a story about a woman he met at a farmer’s market earlier this summer.
“She was an older black lady, independent,” he says. “I stopped by and introduced myself, and she was like, ‘You’re a — Republican?’” He scowled like he was sniffing a carton of milk that had turned. “‘I’ve never seen a Republican,’ she said. ‘Why should I even listen to you?’ And I was like, ‘Ma’am, I just want to have a conversation with you.’” Then he leans in, animated at the memory of their exchange.
Two Lakewood Republicans are considering whether to challenge U.S. Rep. Ed Perlmutter's bid for a seventh term in the 7th Congressional District, Colorado Politics has learned.
Jerry Natividad, who mounted a brief campaign last year for the U.S. Senate seat held by Democrat Michael Bennet, and Mark Barrington, who has run for legislative and city council seats, both said they're thinking about running for the seat — particularly after Perlmutter said in April he was running for governor and wouldn't seek reelection, then dropped from the gubernatorial field in July and then declared in August he was back in the congressional race.
Tom Strand isn't planning on giving up his seat on the Colorado Springs City Council to run for Congress against Republican Doug Lamborn, the entrenched 5th Congressional District incumbent up for election next year.
Strand said his obligations to the council — he was elected as an at-large member in 2015, and as chairman of the Utilities Board are critically important.
Colorado Springs City Councilman Tom Strand plans to enter the crowded Republican primary for the 5th Congressional District seat held by five-term incumbent U.S. Rep. Doug Lamborn, he told Colorado Politics Thursday.
U.S. Rep. Doug Lamborn of Colorado Springs tweeted a scathing criticism Wednesday of the president’s remarks about the weekend's racially charged violence in Charlottesville, Virginia — the Republican congressman’s strongest statement yet on the topic.
For the past month, I’ve written about my 2008 run for the U.S. Congress. These essays have looked inward, at my campaign and the lessons I learned from running. In this essay, please allow me an outward look at my Republican opponents, and to let me swap out my partisan “candidate” hat for my old and battered political-science-professor-at-the-U.S.-Air-Force-Academy hat. I’m going to try to be both insightful and a wee bit profound. Wish me luck.
The U.S. Constitution requires a census be taken every 10 years for the purpose of enumeration — or more simply put, counting folks to figure out how many representatives in the U.S. House each state should have. This is why the political parties are particularly obsessed with the state legislatures in the elections right before and right after a census, because those legislatures will end up redrawing congressional districts based on the census results.
Colorado is no different from the other 49 states in that the Democratic and Republican parties seek to maximize their electoral advantages by gerrymandering the heck out of congressional districts every 10 years. Your own partisanship will help you decide which party is acting more “fairly” and which party is disingenuously trying to grab seats unfairly, but ultimately, across the country, the Dems and the GOP will argue mightily after the decennial census.
Because of the gerrymandering of Colorado, wherein both parties appear to have decided to give each other one truly “safe” seat, the Democratic candidate in the 2nd District (Boulder and beyond) is really tough to beat, and in CD 5 (Colorado Springs and beyond), the Republican candidate is considered unbeatable. Win the appropriate party’s primary in those two districts and you will, very likely, coast to a comfortable victory come November.
Those with a long enough memory will recall that the 5th was represented for many years by a man named Joel Hefley. Congressman Hefley was widely respected across the political spectrum. He was a likeable and competent representative who often garnered upwards of 75% of the vote, meaning a number of Democrats felt comfortable in voting for this moderate and thoughtful gentleman.
This changed in 2006, when Mr. Hefley announced his retirement from Congress. Thus an “open seat” was created in what was considered the safest of the safe Republican congressional slots. Win the GOP primary in 2006, avoid key mistakes, and you would almost certainly win the general election in the fall.
Thus, the 2006 open Republican primary saw no less than SIX candidates, including Mr. Hefley’s former senior staffer, Jeff Crank, the then-mayor of Colorado Springs, Lionel Rivera, a retired two-star general, Bentley Rayburn, and a state senator named Doug Lamborn. As one might expect, the primary campaign was — to use the traditional term — “hard fought” with accusations of naughty behavior abounding. Crank, Lamborn and Rayburn proved to be the most powerful candidates. When the votes were counted (with much yelling and objecting), Mr. Lamborn had edged Mr. Crank by 892 votes, less than 2%, with General Rayburn a close third. All this happened while I was still on active duty with the Air Force, and so my perspective was that of a poli sci professor. It was messy and hinted at a circular firing squad, with a take-no-prisoners attitude all-round.
Two years later, when I tossed my hat into the ring. I found myself in a campaign against not one, but rather three people. This was because, unlike nearly every other congressional campaign in America, the incumbent congressman was challenged by members of his own party, in a primary. And it wasn’t just one person who had the audacity to take on a sitting member, it was two — both Jeff Crank and Bentley Rayburn. Upset by the manner in which the last primary had been run, they sought the GOP nomination for CD5. That meant there were three Republicans and one lone Democrat seeking the seat – Lamborn, Crank, Rayburn and little old me.
I was invited to take part in a series of debates with the Republican candidates, and I happily accepted. At all these events, there were just three of us. Mr. Crank and General Rayburn would attend from the GOP side, and I was there as the Democrat, but Mr. Lamborn never showed up. This was smart politically, in that showing up would, in some minds, acknowledge publically that he was being challenged, and that might demonstrate weakness. But I do think it irritated his challengers.
For me, it was very interesting to watch. I genuinely liked and continue to like, both Jeff Crank and Bentley Rayburn. We disagree on… well… nearly everything, but they are good men who believe, as do I, that the government can do a better job of serving the American people. We just really, really disagree on what needs fixing and how.
But even though I liked both gents, I was mystified as to why they were both running. If you add up the votes from the 2006 primary, Mr. Lamborn only earned 27% of the Republican votes. His top two opponents – Crank and Rayburn — took in a combined 42%, with the remainder spread across the other three vote getters. This would imply that either Crank or Rayburn could possibly beat Mr. Lamborn one-on-one, but that if they split the GOP opposition vote, Mr. Lamborn’s re-nomination was virtually assured. Yet both men stayed in the race all the way to the primary election day. Thus the Republican congressional candidates neatly arranged themselves into what might be called a circular political firing squad and opened fire, with the result being neither of them beating Mr. Lamborn. So much for 2008.
But history seems intent on repeating itself in 2018. Currently two Republicans have jumped into the primary campaign in an effort to take the GOP nomination away from Mr. Lamborn – State Senator Owen Hill and El Paso County Commissioner Darryl Glenn. Both gentlemen would seem to be strong contenders to defeat Mr. Lamborn.
Mr. Hill appears to be a smart and able state legislator. Though I disagree with him on nearly every issue you could mention, there is no denying his appeal to conservative voters, and he has already amassed a war chest of nearly a quarter of a million dollars just for the primary.
Darryl Glenn is, in theory, also a strong contender to win a primary against Mr. Lamborn. Glenn, like Hill, is a retired Air Force officer, which plays well in this district. Mr. Glenn is well-known in the area, and ran against my old boss for the U.S. Senate in 2016.
So once again the Republicans seem to be in the process of forming that same circular firing squad we saw in 2006. A fairly weak incumbent, and two stronger-than-average challengers, seek the GOP nomination in 2018. If history is instructive in this case, it seems likely that the Hill/Glenn duo will split the opposition vote, leaving Mr. Lamborn safe for another two years of relative ineffectiveness in D.C. Will there be a Hill-Glenn deal to have one drop out if the other is stronger? It could happen. But were I a betting man, I’d guess not. Perhaps it’s time to take off my old and frayed professor hat and to put on a helmet. It may be a bumpy ride.
Members of Colorado's congressional delegation from both parties took issue with President Trump's tweets Wednesday morning announcing a ban on transgender military service "in any capacity," although U.S. Rep. Doug Lamborn, a Colorado Springs Republican, said he supported the new policy.
Declaring that the 5th Congressional District needs someone who will "fight for what he knows is right" and not just vote the right way, Darryl Glenn, the GOP nominee for the U.S. Senate in Colorado last year, announced on Monday that he's running for the seat held by incumbent U.S. Rep. Doug Lamborn, another Colorado Springs Republican.
U.S. Rep. Doug Lamborn, a Colorado Springs Republican facing at least two primary challengers next year, raised $72,766 in the most recent fundraising quarter, according to a finance report his campaign filed Friday. He finished with $378,553 on hand at the end of June.