#MeTooCongressNewsSports

Lawmakers: Funding, urgency lacking in Olympic abuse crisis

Authors: Associated Press, Tom Ramstack - May 23, 2018 - Updated: May 24, 2018

AP18143525929433-1280x853.jpg
Witnesses prepare to testify before the House Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee about the Olympic community’s ability to protect athletes from sexual abuse, on Capitol Hill in Washington on May 23. From left are: U.S. Olympic Committee Acting CEO Susanne Lyons, USA Gymnastics President and CEO Kerry Perry, USA Swimming President and CEO Tim Hinchey, USA Taekwondo CEO Steve McNally, USA Volleyball CEO Jamie Davis, and U.S. Center for SafeSport President and CEO Shellie Pfohl. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

WASHINGTON — U.S. Olympic officials should do more than “window dressing” as they attempt to end sexual abuse of athletes, Colorado U.S. Rep. Diana DeGette said during a congressional hearing Wednesday.

DeGette, D-Denver, was addressing officials of the Colorado Springs-based U.S. Olympic Committee who testified about how they plan to resolve abuses publicized during the recent criminal trial of former U.S.A. Gymnastics team doctor Larry Nassar.

Nassar was sentenced to life in prison this year on evidence he allegedly molested about 250 women and girl athletes who sought medical treatment from him. The revelations touched off other sexual abuse allegations against administrators of the U.S. Olympic swim and Taekwondo teams, as well as in college sports.

They also prompted congressional inquiries, such as the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations hearing Wednesday. Congress is trying to decide whether a government agency should do more to oversee the safety of athletes.

DeGette, a member of the subcommittee, said she hoped that U.S. Olympic sports officials were “on the road to real change.”

“We’re not here today to tear down the sporting world,” DeGette said.

One of the main witnesses was Kerry Perry, the new chief executive of U.S.A. Gymnastics. She apologized “to all who were harmed by the horrific acts” of Nassar.

She and other Olympic officials — many recently appointed after firings or resignations of others — acknowledged a pattern of mistakes that included overlooking abuse of athletes to protect administrators’ jobs and reputations.

Since starting her job in December, Perry has reorganized USA Gymnastics by closing the Texas training facility where Nassar worked and firing top coaches and directors.

One of the firings occurred last week, when Perry replaced the head of the women’s gymnastics program. Female athletes said they told her about Nassar’s sexual abuse as far back as 2015.

As part of the restructuring, Perry said Olympic team officials should look at “everything. We look at our structure, we look at our policies, we look at our systems, we look at our medical and we hold ourselves to the highest standard.”

Perry said she has recently been discussing legal settlements with athletes who threatened to sue.

Former Olympian Ariana Kukors Smith filed a lawsuit Monday against USA Swimming that accuses her coach of knowing she was being sexually abused but covering it up.

The U.S. Olympic Committee, which oversees all of the individual sports teams, sought to reduce abuse of athletes by opening the Denver-based U.S. Center for SafeSport in Denver in March 2017. The organization investigates reports of abuse of Olympic athletes and recommends remedial measures. It also develops anti-abuse policies and programs for sports teams.

DeGette sought assurances during the congressional hearing that the Center for SafeSport “has sufficient tools and resources, and whether it operates with enough independence from the organizations it oversees.”

She wanted to know whether audits would be used to ensure the Center for SafeSport is properly investigating complaints, whether sports organizations under its jurisdiction are adopting its anti-abuse standards, and how its educational program is being implemented.

She also sought assurances the Center for SafeSport would be adequately funded.

“I hope we will hear today that if SafeSport needs more money, the U.S. Olympic Committee and governing bodies are prepared to increase substantially the support they provide to this much-needed watchdog,” DeGette said.

Tears and anger came from members of Congress who spent the day fuming over the growing sex-abuse problem in Olympic sports.

“I just hope everyone here realizes the time to talk is over, and you need to walk your talk,” U.S. Rep. Debbie Dingell, D-Mich., said shortly after choking back tears while questioning leaders of the U.S. Olympic Committee, USA Gymnastics and U.S. Center for SafeSport.
The hearing was filled with both substance and spectacle — the latter coming mostly courtesy of a five-minute burst from Rep. Buddy Carter, R-Ga., who told the USOC’s acting CEO, Susanne Lyons, “you should resign your position now,” and tore into Perry and the rest of the panel for not uttering the exact words: “I’m sorry.”
U.S. Olympic Committee Acting CEO Susanne Lyons testifies before the House Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee about the Olympic community’s ability to protect athletes from sexual abuse, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, May 23, 2018. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

“If you don’t want to say you’re sorry, I don’t want to talk to you,” said Carter, who represents the district where a lawsuit that triggered the mushrooming scandal in gymnastics was filed.

In fact, members on the panel of U.S. sports executives did apologize to the victims, whose numbers grow almost daily and whose pain was most heart-wrenchingly displayed during the sentencing hearing Nassar.

But set against the USOC’s slow-moving reforms, to say nothing of the raw numbers presented by SafeSport CEO Shellie Pfohl, some of the apologies felt hollow.

The USOC started talking about reforming its sex-abuse policy in 2010 after a scandal was exposed inside of USA Swimming. From then, it took seven years to open the SafeSport center to independently investigate sex-abuse claims made by Olympic athletes.

Pfohl described an office that has been overwhelmed in the 14 months it has been in business:

U.S. Center for SafeSport President and CEO Shellie Pfohl testifies before the House Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee about the Olympic community’s ability to protect athletes from sexual abuse, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, May 23, 2018. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
  • When it opened in March 2017, Pfohl said the center received 20 to 30 calls a month. In the wake of the #MeToo movement and the Nassar case, that has increased to about 20 to 30 calls per week.
  • SafeSport operates on a budget of $4.3 million a year, $1.55 million of which was recently added as part of the USOC’s mission to bolster its response to the abuse issue. That brought the USOC’s contribution to $3.1 million. (By comparison, the USOC gave the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, in charge of Olympic drug testing in the United States, $3.7 million in 2016. Its budget is more than $19 million.)
  • The budget is enough for 14 full-time employees, which includes five full-time investigators. Seven additional investigators work on a contract basis. The center has fielded 840 reports over 14 months. Reports have come in regarding 38 of the 49 national governing bodies (NGBs).
  • Part of the delay in opening the SafeSport center came because the USOC met reluctance from almost everyone in funding, both from outside and inside the Olympic movement. The NGBs are charged on a sliding scale, depending on their size. USA Swimming contributed only $43,000 this year, “but we’re one of the larger NGBs, and based on who we are, we could provide more resources,” CEO Tim Hinchey said.

Pfohl said she wouldn’t turn it down.

Meanwhile, she is still waiting for paperwork to apply for a $2.5 million grant the government wrote into this year’s budget. (The government gave $9.5 million to USADA in 2016.)

The witnesses testified to a continued lack of uniformity in sex-abuse policies among the NGBs, despite efforts that date to at least 2013. Some publish full lists of banned coaches and athletes. Some distribute them only to members of the organizations.

Under terms of a recently passed law to protect athletes, the NGBs are supposed to be audited randomly by the SafeSport center, but that project is hamstrung because resources do not exist.

Meanwhile, the role of the USOC in overseeing it all remains confusing.

Brought up more than once was an exchange during a deposition for a sex-abuse lawsuit in which a USOC lawyer was asked if protecting athletes was a top priority for the federation.

“The USOC does not have athletes,” answered Gary Johansen, the committee’s associate general counsel — speaking to the reality that, except during the Olympics, athletes technically fall under the umbrella of their individual sports.

Lyons said that mindset will change. “We do hold ourselves responsible, and if there’s a failing, it’s from not properly exercising our authority,” she said.

One of the best examples of the USOC using that authority has been the top-to-bottom housecleaning it demanded from USA Gymnastics.

Most news about the federation’s changes, however, has been delivered in long news releases. Wednesday marked the first time Perry has made public comments since her hiring in December. She left after the hearing without taking questions.

“I’m glad you’re here today, but a lot of people have wanted to hear from you since you took the job,” Dingell said.

But Dingell didn’t really like what she heard — “I don’t hear a sense of urgency,” she said — and she was not alone.

“As compared to how much money a district attorney’s office has, or how much money a Title IX office has at a school, it’s not in the same ballpark at all,” Nancy Hogshead-Makar, Olympic swimmer and outspoken critic of the USOC’s efforts, said of the SafeSport budget. “Shellie desperately needs more money.”

Associated Press

Associated Press


Tom Ramstack

Tom Ramstack