Lamborn alone among Colorado congressmen in opposing legalized marijuana
Author: Tom Ramstack - January 17, 2018 - Updated: January 18, 2018
Colorado’s congressional delegation continued their effort this week to block the federal government’s new crackdown on marijuana use and sales … except for one congressman.
Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colorado Springs, is siding with the Justice Department as it seeks to prosecute marijuana offenses under federal law, regardless of whether state laws in Colorado or elsewhere allow consumption and sale of cannabis.
“The federal government has the right and responsibility to uphold federal laws,” Lamborn said in a statement.
He was referring to the 1970 Controlled Substances Act, a federal law that lists marijuana as an illegal drug.
U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions invoked the law this month when he rescinded an Obama administration policy described in the 2009 Cole Memo. It advocates tolerance of state marijuana laws.
While his fellow Colorado congressmen talk about the economic and medical benefits of marijuana, Lamborn sees a public safety fiasco.
“The social costs of legalizing marijuana in Colorado have been steep, and the negative effects on children are particularly concerning,” he said.
One of the arguments discussed in the General Assembly for legalizing marijuana in 2014 was an opportunity to eliminate the black market created by drug cartels.
Lamborn says it has backfired.
“Rather than lessening criminal activity associated with marijuana, cartels have rushed into Colorado, resulting in 19 cartel operation busts in the last 18 months,” he said. “If we’re honest with ourselves, legalizing marijuana has been bad for the state of Colorado.”
An example of Lamborn’s underdog position on marijuana among Colorado’s state and federal politicians emerged from a conference call last Friday between the U.S. Attorney for Colorado and Colorado congressmen.
The lawmakers were seeking assurances from Colorado U.S. Attorney Robert Troyer that he would not try to override state marijuana laws.
After the phone call, members of the Colorado delegation issued a joint statement saying, “If federal authorities were to suddenly reverse course and take punitive measures to undermine Colorado’s marijuana statutes, it could create a chilling effect on an industry that employs thousands of people in our state, where sales now exceed $1 billion per year. We are united in the view that the federal government shouldn’t subvert the will of our citizens expressed at the state level.”
A press release from Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Denver, added, “With the exception of Rep. Doug Lamborn, Colorado members of Congress are seeking support from congressional colleagues across the nation for several legislative steps to ensure the sanctity of Colorado’s marijuana laws.”
Statewide, support for marijuana remains strong in popular opinion polls. A 2015 survey by Quinnipiac University found 58 percent of Colorado voters support legalized marijuana, while 38 percent opposed it.
Among the opponents is Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper, who has called marijuana legalization “reckless.” In the latest back-and-forth struggle over legalization, Colorado Attorney General Cynthia Coffman joined 18 other attorneys general in a letter sent Tuesday to congressional leaders urging them to allow banks to handle money derived from the marijuana industry.
Federal law now would subject banks to criminal and civil liability for “aiding and abetting” a federal crime and money laundering if they do business with anyone who earned money from sales of marijuana.
As a result, hundreds of licensed marijuana businesses lack access to the banking industry and are unable to accept credit cards, deposit their earnings or write checks to meet payroll or pay taxes. Instead, they accept only
A bill reintroduced by Colorado U.S. Rep. Ed Perlmutter, D-Arvada, last April would allow banks to deal with marijuana businesses without penalties.
The 19 attorneys general told congressional leaders the benefits of the bill, called the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act, outweigh the concerns about illegal drug abuse in the Controlled Substances Act.
The SAFE Banking Act would “bring billions of dollars into the banking sector and give law enforcement the ability to monitor these transactions,” the letter said. “Moreover, compliance with tax requirements would be simpler and easier to enforce with a better-defined tracking of funds.”
Perlmutter added, “States are taking responsible steps to regulate the [marijuana] industry and we must ensure that includes access to the banking system.”
Colorado Sens. Michael Bennet, a Democrat, and Cory Gardner, a Republican, sponsored a companion bill to the SAFE Banking Act in the Senate last May.