EducationNews

Higher property values mean Colorado is getting a refund on K-12 education

Author: Erica Meltzer, Chalkbeat Colorado - January 31, 2018 - Updated: January 31, 2018

40f85d213214d0abf559691c9606afb2-1280x939.jpg
rural teacherFifth-grader Chloe Lamb takes her class work out of her backpack during Dale Carpenter’s class Thursday, Sept. 19, 2013, at Prairie Heights Elementary School in the rural Hanover School District south of Colorado Springs. (The Gazette, Christian Murdock)

Colorado is getting back $104 million that the state planned to spend on schools because local property taxes generated a lot more money than anyone anticipated and there were slightly fewer students than predicted.

Under Colorado law, the total amount of school funding remains constant once it’s set for the year, and if local school districts have more money, the state pays a correspondingly smaller amount. This year, school districts raised $97 million more from local sources, mostly property tax revenue, than predicted.

Republicans on the Joint Budget Committee wanted to put that windfall in the general fund, where it would be available for a range of needs in next year’s budget, including transportation. Democrats wanted to put that money in the state education fund. Because the Joint Budget Committee is evenly divided and the two sides couldn’t agree, under state law the money goes to the state public school fund by default. As the name indicates, that’s also money for education.

The disagreement is tied to the big political battle of this legislative session. The state has more money than it’s had in a while, and Republicans say it’s time for Colorado to make a big investment in its roads. Democrats want to spread the money around to education, housing, and other needs.

Chief legislative analyst Craig Harper told the committee that the location of the money in any particular state fund won’t make a big difference in his recommendations for education spending in the 2018-19 fiscal year. 

State Rep. Millie Hamner, a Dillon Democrat, said keeping the money in education represents an important symbolic commitment.

“The mid-year adjustment resulted in a windfall to the state,” she said. By keeping the money in an education fund, “we would be sending the message that we have a lot of work to do in funding our public schools.”

The 2017-18 budget had called for $4.2 billion from the state and $2.4 billion from local school districts to go toward K-12 education, for a total program $6.6 billion. The budget stabilization factor – the amount by which Colorado underfunds its schools when compared to the requirements of Amendment 23 – was $828 million. Budget analysts and officials with the state Department of Education had recommended keeping the total program amount the same, which would have brought the budget stabilization factor down to $815 million and left schools with a little bit more money per pupil than they had before.

However, Republicans wanted to hold per-pupil funding steady at an average of $7,662.18, and their view prevailed. Because the number of students is also smaller, total spending on education when state and local share are combined will now be $7 million less.

To keep that in perspective, that’s one-tenth of 1 percent of the total spending on K-12 education in Colorado.

 

___

Chalkbeat is a nonprofit news site covering educational change in public schools.

Erica Meltzer, Chalkbeat Colorado